Many heroes, who don’t see themselves as heroes, gave testimony at the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI). In their mind, they only did what their conscience demanded of them. On the other hand, the Hydras, also, don’t see themselves as villains or criminals, but time and evidence will prove who is Hero; who is Hydra.
“In a time of universal deceit, speaking truth is a heroic act.”

Heroes need to be remembered and modelled;
Hydras exposed, indicted, convicted.
Heroes look
above and beyond
Welcome to Heroes & Hydras
As we begin this “Hero and Hydra” series1 some might consider Hydra-Heydrichite to be outrageous hyperbole as applied to “authorities” who conceived and enforced the COVID-narrative, but as evidence continues to escape aggressive censorship, we will, in coming months and years, come to know that what was done in the 1930s and ’40s was but a lesser prelude to a 2020s global, Utopian, criminal conspiracy2 — a final solution to the despised chaos of freedom / choice / agency without regard to age, gender, race, or ethnicity. Covidism3 became the dogma of most (naïve? captured? compromised? corrupted?) power elites on every level from local to global. Men and women with iron hearts became the norm. But, regardless of the risk, there were men, women, and even children of conscience and integrity who spoke up against the lies and crimes — becoming heroes.
----------------------------/
1. First begun at Déjà Vu – Times:
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2024/01/001-heroes-and-hydras.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2024/01/002-hero-hydra-stories-dr-peter-gtzsche.html
2. https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/01/utopians-at-open-gates.html
3. A term coined by others perhaps as early as 2020.
For some of the COVID dogma see: https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2021/10/what-is-covid-narrative.html
4. https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/testimony/

Saturday, March 14, 2026

#88: Aaron Pete - Indigenous Chief, Podcaster,

In the current climate of "black-and-white" thinking* that drives so much of the present culture and academia, it takes a special courage to say, "Let's talk. Let us favor freedom of thought and speech and open discussion."


A Chief Breaks Down the Unmarked Graves Controversy
Nuanced with Aaron Pete | Aug 25, 2025 |Time 58:49 min.) at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_bIw4psDnU



Frances Widdowson & Chief Pete DEBATE the Unmarked Graves Story
Nuanced with Aaron Pete and Frances Widdowson | Sep 9, 2025 | Time 1:26:10 min.) at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR0XyUvmZoc
-------------------------------/
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology)
"Splitting, also called binary thinking, dichotomous thinking, black-and-white thinking, all-or-nothing thinking, or thinking in extremes, is the failure in a person's thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both perceived positive and negative qualities of something into a cohesive, realistic whole. It is a common defense mechanism,[1] wherein the individual tends to think in extremes (e.g., an individual's actions and motivations are all good or all bad with no middle ground). This kind of dichotomous interpretation is contrasted by an acknowledgement of certain nuances known as "shades of gray".[2] Splitting can include different contexts, as individuals who use this defense mechanism may "split" representations of their own mind, of their own personality, and of others.[3] Splitting is observed in personality disorders belonging to cluster B, such as borderline personality disorder and narcissistic personality disorder,[4][5] as well as schizophrenia and depression.[6][7] In dissociative identity disorder, the term splitting is used to refer to a split in personality alter-egos."